Author: harryyan

Peer Review

Peer Review Template

Learning Pod: #6

Peers’ Names: Jin, Peter, Zhihao Cui, Chuyi Zeng

Interactive Learning Resource Topic: Personal Finance

Identify components of the Interactive Learning Resource that might be missing (e.g., appropriate outcomes, alignment, interactivity, inclusivity, technology use and rationale, presentation, grammar, spelling, citations, etc.).

– The references of the interactive activities are missing from the reference list.
– Besides the interactive activities, learners are supposed to have other activities but missing from each topic.
– Missing the reference and citation of the chart in the section “Question 4: What is the trend of personal finance?”.

Provide a summary of The Interactive Learning Resource’s strengths and weaknesses. Draw out specific examples from your peers’ work to justify your feedback.

Strengths:
Overall, this is a very comprehensive Interactive Learning Resource (ILR) that contains basically everything needed. Each section is also clearly thought out. Peers did a good job on editing. There seem to be no spelling or grammar issues.

I really like the interactive activities included in each of your topic and your detailed introduction and explanation of them. For example, you use the site Glimpse to let learners to see the theme of today’s emerging personal finance trends.

I also like the section of “Overview Of The Assessment Plan”. You detailly stated that Quizlet will be your technology platform for assessments, and you are going to use single-choice and multiple-choice question to test your learners. You describe the content of the multiple-choice questions in each section separately and which part of the learners’ knowledge they will test. For example, “The questions in the first part are single-choice questions, which are all related to the most basic theoretical knowledge and are used to test the degree of learners’ mastery of theoretical knowledge”. 

Weaknesses:
For the section “A Rationale For The Technology Choices”, I did not get the connection between Google Docs and single parents with full-time jobs and children. Why can Google Docs let single parents with full-time jobs and children study in their free time? Maybe this part needs more clarification.

Furthermore, in the section “Learning Design”, I think there is a lack of more detailed explanation and plan for your direct instruction teaching method. How are you going to use direct instruction teaching method in your ILR and how is this method related to your learning design? This part is a bit unclear.

Moreover, the section “Learning Outcomes” is a bit wordy and could be more concise.

Provide general, specific, and practical recommendations to your peers on how to improve their Interactive Learning Resource. 

Overall, you did a wonderful job on your ILR! But in addition to adding the missing components, there is still room for improvement. First, you could make more explanations to the connection between Google Docs and single parents with full-time jobs and children. For example, you could mention that Google Docs is concise, free, or other points that are particularly helpful for single parents. You can also consider its continuity, such as the automatic saving. Because single parents may encounter some unexpected events, such as a crying child or something like that, when the attention will be diverted to the child, it is easy to forget to save the file. But with the automatic saving, you don’t have to worry about it. Furthermore, you could add more explanations to how you are going to use direct instruction teaching method in your ILR and how this method is related to your learning design. Moreover, I think it would be better to concisely list the learning outcomes one by one rather than just writing everything in a paragraph. 

Comment on Thomas

Hi Thomas, thank your for sharing. I like the way the video you choose will keep pushing the students to interact with the prompts. Clicking on numerous prompts and providing yes or no questions are very effective way to focus and learn. And I really like that you are introducing A.I. to learners, and I believe it will be a convenient and accurate way to help students learn.

EDCI 335 Blog Post #4

Cool History Bros “Qin Shi Huang – The Rise and Fall of the First Emperor of China (Complete Series)”

In what way are they likely to respond to the video on their own, e.g. make notes, do an activity, think about the topic (learner-generated)?

My group interactive learning resource is about the history of Chinese dynasties. The video I chose for students is about the history of one of the Chinese dynasties, Qin dynasty. This video is telling about a detailed history from rise to fall of Qin dynasty. This history includes many people and events, such as Qin Shi Huang, Fusu, Han Feizi, Qin’s attack on Zhao, etc. Therefore, taking notes would be a very useful way to study to record key points such as the role of characters, the relationship between characters, what role events played in history, etc. Otherwise you will not be able to remember these intricacies of history.

What activity could you suggest that they do, after they have watched the video (designed)? What type of knowledge or skill would that activity help develop? What medium or technology would students use to do the activity?

I’ll be running zoom breakout rooms to let students debate controversial topics. For example, Qin Shi Huang is a very controversial character. Some people think he made an outstanding contribution to the creation of a new Chinese history, but others think he ruled with extreme cruelty, so I want students to debate based on their own ideas. In this process, the students were able to exercise their debating skills, consolidate their knowledge of history, and get some new insights from other students.

How would students get feedback on the activity that you set? What medium or technology would they and/or you use for getting and giving feedback on their activity?

I would listen to each Zoom breakout group’s debate and grade each student with a feedback based on, in a fixed period of time,  the number of times they spoke, how convincingly they made their points, and how flexibly they applied what they had learned.

How will you address any potential barriers for your learners in the use of this video to ensure an inclusive design?

I make the assumption that someone of my students may be with lost hearing or colorblindness. The video I chose is from YouTube, which has a real-time captioning feature, so don’t have to worry about lost-hearing students not being able to keep up. This video is also produced by animation, very interesting, but does not require the ability to distinguish colors to learn knowledge, so color-blind students can also learn without obstacles.

References:

Cool History Bros. (2020). Qin Shi Huang – The Rise and Fall of the First Emperor of China (Complete Series). YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-xbh_q0RoA.

Comment on Caitlin

Hi Caitlin,

Thank you for sharing. I like your idea of using three pillars, which are representation, engagement, and action or expression, to ensure that the needs of all learners are met in your interactive learning resource. And you detail each pillar, like you will use videos or readings to support representation of the topic; use collaboration, group work, etc to support engagement in your classroom; and make students draw, tell stories, etc to support the pillar of action or expression. These detailed insights give me a good idea of how the three pillars help students learn.

EDCI335 Blog Post #3

Let us make an assumption of students must study at home under the situation of pandemic. In addition to this, I would like to make the additional assumption that my students include a few with color blindness or loss of hearing. My group interactive learning resource is about the history of Chinese dynasties. Under such a situation of pandemic, I will do online teaching. I will provide weekly asynchronous lecture videos and some videos from the Internet that can be used as teaching material to students. The reason for asynchronous video is that students may not be able to keep their attention on the online course due to the lack of learning atmosphere or other factors, so the recorded videos is easy for students to study again and again after class and make up for the knowledge gaps. Of course, any video-based instruction must include synchronous captioning to help the students with loss of hearing learn. When it comes to the need for some pictures to deliver teaching content, I will choose some pictures where color does not play an important role. In other words, students with color blindness can learn and understand through pictures just like normal students. In addition to the videos, I will also provide some relevant articles for students to read and learn. Of course, assessments are also essential. Students will also have to pass quizzes and give presentations to reflect their knowledge, but these will all be online. Quizzes may be administered on a multiple choice and short answer basis. Office Hour will also be set up as usual. In addition, I will also set up an online forum for students to discuss and ask me questions. In fact, some students may not communicate with instructors or classmates in person because of shyness and other reasons, so online forums may be a good place for them to communicate and ask or answer questions.

Comment on Sujean

Hi Sujean,

Your informative post about cooperative learning is truly interesting. I enjoyed your detailed description and listing of the elements of collaborative learning, which gave me a good idea of exactly what it entails. You mention how cooperative learning aligns with a growth mindset, and I believe it is a good technology for your interactive resource. Students work together and rely on each other to achieve their goals, which is helpful for growth mindsets because they all learn new content and grow in the process. I appreciate you sharing the article since it taught me more about cooperative learning.

EDCI 335 Blog Post #2

Direct instruction is a common teacher-centered approach. According to Guzmán & Payá (2020), with an emphasis on the interactions between instructors and students, its main goal is to encourage student on-task behavior via specific teaching, continual support, and student involvement in effective practice. Modeling, reinforcement, feedback, and repeated approximations are some of its essential elements. Direct instruction seems to have a certain connection with Behaviorism. They have very similar components and they both get reaction from students by stimulating. According to Louden (2014), I learnt about the direct instruction is based on Behaviorism, and “Direct Instruction breaks each learning task down into its smallest component and requires mastery of simpler skills before proceeding to more difficult skills”. Students must understand the current knowledge before learning new knowledge.

I believe direct instruction is an appropriate teaching approach for our topic Chinese history. We are mainly taking about the history of Chinese dynasties. For the learning design, it is necessary to pre-assess students how much they know about the dynasties and their histories in order to help instructor determine the starting point of instruction. Then we need to guide students in our study environment. To provide syllabus as behavioral objectives, like to memorize some important events and key characters of each dynasty. And to provide relative assessments, like quizzes or presentation, to test their extent of grasping the knowledge as intended reaction. Next, it is important to provide informative feedback on assessments. It is also important to provide rewards and penalties, like a bonus mark on their grade, and they need to stay after class or use their free time to catch up on their missing knowledge, to stimulate students to their intended reaction. Every student must pass their assessments for entering next chapter of teaching. I believe the direct teaching method will be applicable to our students to learn Chinese history better.

Guzmán, J. F., & Payá, E. (2020). Direct instruction vs. cooperative learning in physical education: Effects on student learning, behaviors, and subjective experience. Sustainability12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124893 

Louden, B. (2014, July 17). Direct instruction and the teaching of reading. The Conversation. Retrieved October 7, 2022, from https://theconversation.com/direct-instruction-and-the-teaching-of-reading-29157

Comment on Kevin

Hi Kevin, thank you for sharing your learning experience in the ESL class. And I agree with your views on behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Learning is seen by students as a connection between stimuli and responses for behaviorism; human cognition is the outcome of the interplay between outside stimuli and a subject’s own internal mental processes for cognitivism; and the concept of knowledge and the perception of students contribute to constructivism. But I think it would be better if you could connect these three theories to your learning experience in a detailed elaboration.

https://xiankevin.opened.ca

EDCI 335 Blog Post #1

How would the learning be designed differently by a behaviorist, a cognitivist, and a constructivist? Scenario: A high school social study teacher is planning a class on climate change.

Behaviorist:

For a behaviorist, through practices, the stimulus, the reaction, and the relationship between the two are the crucial components. A behaviorist’s learning design may be like:

  • To pre-assess students how much they know about the climate change in order to help instructor determine the starting point of instruction.
  • To provide syllabus as behavioral objectives, like to understand the key points of the climate change. And to provide relative assessments, like quizzes, to test their extent of grasping the knowledge as intended reaction.
  • To provide informative feedback on assessments, and provide rewards, like the bonus mark on their grade, to stimulate students do their intended reaction.
  • Students must pass the assessments before learning new knowledge.

Cognitivist:

For a cognitivist, learning is not only dependent on external stimuli, but also requires learners to actively code, reorganize, memorize knowledge, and connect existing and new knowledge together. A cognitivist’s learning design may be like:

  • To pre-assess students how much they know about the climate change in order to help instructor consider the way of connecting students’ existing knowledge and new content and guide students to actively participate in learning.
  • To use concept mapping to help students visually dig into a new knowledge with existing knowledge. To use mnemonics to help students better memorize the knowledge of climate change.
  • To arrange quizzes and assignments and provide informative feedback on the knowledge gap to make the connections happen.

Constructivist:

For a constructivist, the focus is more on the learning of the learner than on the teaching. Learners are encouraged to actively engage in the ability to construct knowledge, rather than just accepting objective knowledge. A constructivist’s learning design may be like:

  • To provide students with contexts in which the information they can learn from and could be applied, like some activities or organizations on improving climate change issues. 
  • To arrange group study or office hour for students to argue questions with peers or discuss with instructors to seek answers and construct knowledge, and students can improve their ability to explain how they understand the needs assessment process.

References:

Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. (2018). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. In R. E. West, Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology: The Past, Present, and Future of Learning and Instructional Design Technology. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/behaviorism_cognitivism_constructivism

© 2025 Harry Yan

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑